Why are States considering opting-out from workers’ compensation

For many years, Texas was the only state that allowed employers to opt out of the workers compensation system. Opting out from the workers compensation system, strips a state’s employers of the exclusive remedy protection of the workers compensation law, as well as certain common law defenses to worker injury claims.

Recently, other states have looked at the business climate in Texas and considered the merits of an opt-out system. Last year, Oklahoma began allowing employers to opt out of the state’s workers compensation law on the condition that they provide comparable benefits to injured workers under an alternative plan. While challenges to the law were expected, so far none have been successful in striking down the right of the employer to opt out. Last month, the Oklahoma Supreme Court declined to hear a case in which two injured workers were seeking to have the law declared unconstitutional.

Bills have been introduced in Tennessee and South Carolina that would allow employers in these states to opt out of the workers compensation system and create their own occupational injury benefit plan. As in Oklahoma, employers in these states would have to obtain approval from the appropriate state department by showing they are financially capable of supporting the plan and that all required benefits are being provided. With legislatures in recess, both bills — the Tennessee Employee Injury Benefit Alternative (Senate Bill 721) and the South Carolina Employee Injury Benefit Plan Alternative (H. 4197) are on hold until 2016. Even so, the opt-out movement appears to be gaining steam.

Published by IRMI  ISSN: 1949-419X

Compcheck Commentary: ¬† IRMI with this published article has made a very good and very important point. We are not here to “politicize” but we are here to earn a living by servicing our clients the best way we know how. First, there is no question that health care costs have skyrocketed. Second, there is no question that the costs of workers compensation insurance have skyrocketed also. The second is a direct consequence and a product of the first. In a previous news article we posted, published by Reuters on June 11, titled “Many US hospitals mark up prices 1000 percent”, Reuters makes it abundantly clear, that workers compensation medical costs are not as highly regulated as Medicare costs are, and therefore “…employers who pay into workers compensation…pay full freight…that results in higher premiums…”.

State Legislatures are starting to become aware of the disparity between “standard care” and “high costs”, especially as it affects local business. We all agree there is a definite link between domiciling business in a State and the actual operating cost of that business. If an owner has to choose between keeping the business healthy or driving it into the ground simply by operation of law, there will be no choice. Either the business will go bankrupt and local consumers will loose their jobs, or the business will re-domicile in another State, in which case, local consumers will still loose their jobs. Either way, the local economy and people will be affected.

We know we may be painting a simple picture of what is purported to be a complicated problem. Well, that may be true, but the fact is, the business owner has another option. Get involved in an attempt to control insurance premiums, which every one knows, are a big percentage of the overall operating expenses. The insurance industry and its machinations, is not being taught in the business schools or simply learned by reading. If a business owner finds the “right person” in an insurance broker and the “right” relationship is established, that business owner has accomplished one of the most important tasks in keeping their business alive and healthy.

With over 95 years of experience under our belt, Compcheck Corp has been in the forefront of successfully assisting insurance brokers and their clients, in drastically reducing insurance premium costs, especially in the workers compensation arena. These reductions can have a retroactive effect in reducing the applicable mod rates which insurance companies use to calculate workers compensation premiums. There are two (2) options: One is not to have any workers compensation claims, and two, is to mitigate the claims you have or the ones you will have. Obviously, option one is not a natural or a logical option; they call them “accidents”, in simple language and for a reason; they are after all, by definition, unexpected. These claims will always be there with a certain frequency and or severity. The other option, the one involving mitigation or reduction of claims costs, is what Compcheck Corp does. It reduces and or mitigates the frequency and or severity of these claims and thereby reduces the cost of workers compensation insurance.

There is one thing for certain; regardless of what State Legislatures do in the future to assist businesses in reducing their workers compensation insurance premium costs, the need for claims frequency and or severity mitigation, will always be there. That’s why you need Compcheck Corp.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Mike Turano, the founder of Compcheck, was a pioneer in identifying the universal need for workers’ compensation successful claims auditing, management and rate reduction with the associated subsequent overall insurance premium cost reduction.
Tony Damoulis has made the international world of the insurance and re-insurance industry his home since 1972. Tony’s professional experience includes declaratory judgements, medical malpractice, other professional liability claims and the standard primary and surplus secondary insurance markets, along with reinsurance and alternative risk funding.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Many US hospitals mark up prices 1,000 percent, study says

Published June 09, 2015 by Reuters

Even the astronomical price markups that consumers regularly pay for, say, wine in restaurants pale beside those in some U.S. hospitals: The price for procedures is often 10 times the cost, according to a study published on Monday in the journal Health Affairs.

Of the 50 hospitals with the highest markups, 49 are for-profit, including 25 owned by Community Health Systems.

Community Health and other for-profits did not respond to requests for explain their markups, but in the past hospitals have said list prices, shown on a “chargemaster,” are irrelevant because “no one” pays those.

In fact, out-of-network patients and the uninsured are often charged list prices, said Dr. Renee Hsia of the University of California, San Francisco, who has studied hospital charges but was not involved in this research. “People do get bills based on the chargemaster, and for out-of-network care insured patients pay a percentage” of chargemaster prices, she said.

Auto insurers, covering care after accidents, and workers’ compensation also pay full freight. (emphasis ours). “That results in higher premiums for auto insurance and for employers who pay into workers’ comp,” said study co-author Ge Bai of Washington & Lee University. “That means we are all victims of these markups.”

Hsia and Gerard Anderson of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health blamed lack of regulation and transparency for 1,000 percent markups. Non-transparency means patients cannot learn what a procedure will cost before they get a bill, preventing comparison shopping.

Those bills can be eye-opening. Hsia, for instance, found that charges for a lipid panel blood test varied from $10 in one California hospital to $10,169 in another; opening blocked arteries cost $22,047 in one, $165,386 in another.

For their study, Anderson and Bai analyzed 2012 data, the latest available, from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to identify the 50 hospitals with the highest markup over Medicare’s allowed charges, which Medicare considers a hospital’s cost.

The 50 had an average markup of 1,010 percent, vs. 340 percent for the other 4,433.

Data for 2013, released last week, support the findings. The hospital with the highest markup in 2012, North Okaloosa Medical Center in Florida, charged $113,000 to treat respiratory infections in 2013, vs. Medicare’s $10,000. In second place, Carepoint Health-Bayonne in New Jersey charged $193,000 for pneumonia vs. Medicare’s $9,600.

To treat hemorrhage, common in auto accidents, Okaloosa charged $79,350 vs. Medicare’s reimbursement of $5,177.


Tony Damoulis, in addition to being our Director of Operations, also directs our liability division that deals exclusively with our clients’ risk and claims management needs.

 

Who We Are and What We Do

The interactive video below, explains in seven short screens, how we can help your agency with value-added services that could be offered to your current and prospective clients as an integral part of your agency or, at your option, on a “per client” or on an “as needed” basis.

Please click on the video below to start.

We are available for a consultation to discuss your agency’s needs. Contact us either by phone, fax or email or simply use our “Contact Us” link located at the top and bottom of everyone of our pages.


Tony Damoulis, in addition to being our Director of Operations, also directs our liability division that deals exclusively with our clients’ risk and claims management needs.